What are the chances of seeing a Cinereous Harrier in Nahuel Huapi National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Cinereous Harrier sighting in Nahuel Huapi National Park on a given day, based on 65 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 63rd most-seen of the 111 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Cinereous Harrier in Nahuel Huapi National Park?
September
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Cinereous Harrier in Nahuel Huapi National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–June and August, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Cinereous Harrier?
Between 4 and 7 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Cinereous Harrier sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Nahuel Huapi National Park the best place to see a Cinereous Harrier?
4th of 5
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Cinereous Harrier sightings, Nahuel Huapi National Park ranks 4th at about 10%. The best odds are in Torres del Paine National Park (Chile, about 40%), Península Valdés (Argentina, about 10%) and Iberá National Park (Argentina, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Cinereous Harrier live in Nahuel Huapi National Park?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the Cinereous Harrier that you can see in Nahuel Huapi National Park (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are Black-chested Buzzard-Eagle (about 10%) and Variable Hawk (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Cinereous Harrier sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Cinereous Harrier is recorded against all the birds logged in Nahuel Huapi National Park (65 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.