What are the chances of seeing a Paddyfield Parasol in Namdapha National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Paddyfield Parasol sighting in Namdapha National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 46th most-seen of the 71 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 70%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Paddyfield Parasol in Namdapha National Park?
November
In that month about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Paddyfield Parasol in Namdapha National Park on a given day, against about 10% in February–May and September, the lowest months. That is one of Namdapha National Park's driest months, with about 35 mm of rain against 660 mm in July. June to August have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Paddyfield Parasol?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Paddyfield Parasol sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Namdapha National Park the best place to see a Paddyfield Parasol?
Yes
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Paddyfield Parasol sightings, Namdapha National Park has the highest daily chance: about 30%. Next come Khao Yai National Park (Thailand, about 30%) and Kanha National Park (India, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Paddyfield Parasol live in Namdapha National Park?
Same family: Libellulidae
The closest relatives of the Paddyfield Parasol that you can see in Namdapha National Park (family Libellulidae, Skimmers) are Blue-Tailed Forest Hawk (about 40%), Blue Marsh Hawk (about 30%) and Crimson-Tailed Marsh Hawk (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Paddyfield Parasol sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Paddyfield Parasol is recorded against all the insects logged in Namdapha National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.