What are the chances of seeing a Blue-Tailed Forest Hawk in Namdapha National Park?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report a Blue-Tailed Forest Hawk sighting in Namdapha National Park on a given day, based on 12 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 22nd most-seen of the 71 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 80%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Blue-Tailed Forest Hawk in Namdapha National Park?
May and October
In those months about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Blue-Tailed Forest Hawk in Namdapha National Park on a given day, against about 10% in January to March, the lowest months. June to August have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Blue-Tailed Forest Hawk?
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Blue-Tailed Forest Hawk sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Namdapha National Park the best place to see a Blue-Tailed Forest Hawk?
Yes
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Blue-Tailed Forest Hawk sightings, Namdapha National Park has the highest daily chance: about 40%. Next come Doi Inthanon National Park (Thailand, about 30%) and Taroko National Park (Taiwan, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Blue-Tailed Forest Hawk live in Namdapha National Park?
Same genus: Orthetrum
The closest relatives of the Blue-Tailed Forest Hawk that you can see in Namdapha National Park (genus Orthetrum) are Blue Marsh Hawk (about 30%) and Crimson-Tailed Marsh Hawk (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Blue-Tailed Forest Hawk sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Blue-Tailed Forest Hawk is recorded against all the insects logged in Namdapha National Park (12 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.