Euthalia monina
In 3 days ~60% in a week ~90%
Euthalia monina, the powdered baron or Malay baron, is a species of nymphalid butterfly. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cuc Phuong National Park | 🇻🇳 Vietnam | |
| 2 | Namdapha National Park | 🇮🇳 India | |
| 3 | Khao Luang National Park | 🇹🇭 Thailand | |
| 4 | Kaeng Krachan National Park | 🇹🇭 Thailand |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yogyakarta | 🇮🇩 Indonesia | |
| 2 | Tasikmalaya | 🇮🇩 Indonesia | |
| 3 | Singapore | 🇸🇬 Singapore | |
| 4 | Kuala Lumpur | 🇲🇾 Malaysia | |
| 5 | Bandung | 🇮🇩 Indonesia | |
| 6 | Jakarta | 🇮🇩 Indonesia |
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Powdered Baron sighting in Namdapha National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 59th most-seen of the 71 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
November
In that month about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Powdered Baron in Namdapha National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–April and December–January, the lowest months. That is one of Namdapha National Park's driest months, with about 35 mm of rain against 660 mm in July. June to August have too few records to rate.
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Powdered Baron sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
2nd of 4
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Powdered Baron sightings, Namdapha National Park ranks 2nd at about 30%. The best odds are in Cuc Phuong National Park (Vietnam, about 40%).
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Powdered Baron is recorded against all the insects logged in Namdapha National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
