What are the chances of seeing a Himalayan Jester in Namdapha National Park?
Likely
About 50% of wildlife watchers report a Himalayan Jester sighting in Namdapha National Park on a given day, based on 25 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 11th most-seen of the 71 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 90%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Himalayan Jester in Namdapha National Park?
November
In that month about 70% of wildlife watchers report a Himalayan Jester in Namdapha National Park on a given day, against about 10% in April, the lowest month. That is one of Namdapha National Park's driest months, with about 35 mm of rain against 660 mm in July. June to August have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Himalayan Jester?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Himalayan Jester sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Namdapha National Park the best place to see a Himalayan Jester?
Among the best
Of the 7 parks where we can rate Himalayan Jester sightings, Namdapha National Park ranks 2nd at about 50%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Cuc Phuong National Park (Vietnam, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Himalayan Jester live in Namdapha National Park?
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Himalayan Jester that you can see in Namdapha National Park (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Large Yeoman (about 60%), Indian Purple Emperor (about 60%) and Popinjay (about 50%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Himalayan Jester sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Himalayan Jester is recorded against all the insects logged in Namdapha National Park (25 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.