What are the chances of seeing a Slender-billed Weaver in Nyungwe National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Slender-billed Weaver sighting in Nyungwe National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 229th most-seen of the 252 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Slender-billed Weaver in Nyungwe National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Slender-billed Weaver in Nyungwe National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Slender-billed Weaver?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Slender-billed Weaver sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Nyungwe National Park the best place to see a Slender-billed Weaver?
8th of 10
Of the 10 parks where we can rate Slender-billed Weaver sightings, Nyungwe National Park ranks 8th at under 5%. The best odds are in Queen Elizabeth National Park (Uganda, about 30%), Virunga National Park (Democratic Republic of the Congo, about 10%) and Murchison Falls National Park (Uganda, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Slender-billed Weaver live in Nyungwe National Park?
Same genus: Ploceus
The closest relatives of the Slender-billed Weaver that you can see in Nyungwe National Park (genus Ploceus, Typical Weavers) are Baglafecht Weaver (about 30%), Strange Weaver (about 20%) and Dark-backed Weaver (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Slender-billed Weaver sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Slender-billed Weaver is recorded against all the birds logged in Nyungwe National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.