What are the chances of seeing a California Scrub-Jay in Olympic National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a California Scrub-Jay sighting in Olympic National Park on a given day, based on 73 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 161st most-seen of the 216 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a California Scrub-Jay in Olympic National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a California Scrub-Jay in Olympic National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a California Scrub-Jay?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most California Scrub-Jay sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Olympic National Park the best place to see a California Scrub-Jay?
9th of 9
Of the 9 parks where we can rate California Scrub-Jay sightings, Olympic National Park ranks 9th at under 5%. The best odds are in Cabo Pulmo National Park (Mexico, about 60%), Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks (United States, about 40%) and Joshua Tree National Park (United States, about 40%).
Which relatives of the California Scrub-Jay live in Olympic National Park?
Same family: Corvidae
The closest relatives of the California Scrub-Jay that you can see in Olympic National Park (family Corvidae, Crows, Jays, and Magpies) are American Crow (about 60%), Steller's Jay (about 50%) and Common Raven (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the California Scrub-Jay sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the California Scrub-Jay is recorded against all the birds logged in Olympic National Park (73 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.