What are the chances of seeing a Blue-Topped Satyr in Piedras Blancas National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Blue-Topped Satyr sighting in Piedras Blancas National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 69th most-seen of the 117 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Blue-Topped Satyr in Piedras Blancas National Park?
June to August
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Blue-Topped Satyr in Piedras Blancas National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May and September–January, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Blue-Topped Satyr?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Blue-Topped Satyr sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Piedras Blancas National Park the best place to see a Blue-Topped Satyr?
3rd of 5
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Blue-Topped Satyr sightings, Piedras Blancas National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%. The best odds are in Podocarpus National Park (Ecuador, about 30%) and Serra dos Órgãos National Park (Brazil, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Blue-Topped Satyr live in Piedras Blancas National Park?
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Blue-Topped Satyr that you can see in Piedras Blancas National Park (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are White Peacock (about 40%), Banded Peacock (about 40%) and Doris Longwing (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Blue-Topped Satyr sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Blue-Topped Satyr is recorded against all the insects logged in Piedras Blancas National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.