What are the chances of seeing a Blue-Topped Satyr in Podocarpus National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Blue-Topped Satyr sighting in Podocarpus National Park on a given day, based on 22 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 5th most-seen of the 61 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Blue-Topped Satyr in Podocarpus National Park?
July–August and November–April
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Blue-Topped Satyr in Podocarpus National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May–June and September–October, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Blue-Topped Satyr?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Blue-Topped Satyr sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Podocarpus National Park the best place to see a Blue-Topped Satyr?
Yes
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Blue-Topped Satyr sightings, Podocarpus National Park has the highest daily chance: about 30%. Next come Serra dos Órgãos National Park (Brazil, about 10%) and Piedras Blancas National Park (Costa Rica, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Blue-Topped Satyr live in Podocarpus National Park?
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Blue-Topped Satyr that you can see in Podocarpus National Park (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Numata Longwing (about 30%), Pedaliodes pelinna (about 30%) and Actinote negra (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Blue-Topped Satyr sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Blue-Topped Satyr is recorded against all the insects logged in Podocarpus National Park (22 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.