Mythimna conigera
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%
Mythimna conigera, the brown-line bright-eye, is a moth of the family Noctuidae. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mercantour National Park | 🇫🇷 France | |
| 2 | Vanoise National Park | 🇫🇷 France | |
| 3 | Aigüestortes National Park | 🇪🇸 Spain | |
| 4 | Ecrins National Park | 🇫🇷 France | |
| 5 | Pyrénées National Park | 🇫🇷 France |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Brown-Line Bright-Eye sighting in Pyrénées National Park on a given day, based on 25 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 363rd most-seen of the 1277 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
July and August
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Brown-Line Bright-Eye in Pyrénées National Park on a given day, against under 5% in September to June, the lowest months.
Between 10 pm and 1 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Brown-Line Bright-Eye sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
5th of 5
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Brown-Line Bright-Eye sightings, Pyrénées National Park ranks 5th at about 10%. The best odds are in Mercantour National Park (France, about 20%), Vanoise National Park (France, about 10%) and Aigüestortes National Park (Spain, about 10%).
Same genus: Mythimna
The closest relatives of the Brown-Line Bright-Eye that you can see in Pyrénées National Park (genus Mythimna) are Armyworm Moth (about 10%), The Delicate (about 10%) and The White-Point (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Brown-Line Bright-Eye is recorded against all the insects logged in Pyrénées National Park (25 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
