What are the chances of seeing a Brown-chested Alethe in Queen Elizabeth National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Brown-chested Alethe sighting in Queen Elizabeth National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 418th most-seen of the 434 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Brown-chested Alethe in Queen Elizabeth National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Brown-chested Alethe in Queen Elizabeth National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Brown-chested Alethe?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Brown-chested Alethe sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Queen Elizabeth National Park the best place to see a Brown-chested Alethe?
3rd of 4
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Brown-chested Alethe sightings, Queen Elizabeth National Park ranks 3rd at under 5%. The best odds are in Semuliki National Park (Uganda, about 10%) and Kibale National Park (Uganda, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Brown-chested Alethe live in Queen Elizabeth National Park?
Same family: Muscicapidae
The closest relatives of the Brown-chested Alethe that you can see in Queen Elizabeth National Park (family Muscicapidae, Old World Flycatchers, Robins, and Chats) are White-browed Robin-Chat (about 40%), Northern Black-Flycatcher (about 40%) and Swamp Flycatcher (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Brown-chested Alethe sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Brown-chested Alethe is recorded against all the birds logged in Queen Elizabeth National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.