What are the chances of seeing a Grey Tit-Flycatcher in Queen Elizabeth National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Grey Tit-Flycatcher sighting in Queen Elizabeth National Park on a given day, based on 25 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 298th most-seen of the 434 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Grey Tit-Flycatcher in Queen Elizabeth National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Grey Tit-Flycatcher in Queen Elizabeth National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Grey Tit-Flycatcher?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Grey Tit-Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Queen Elizabeth National Park the best place to see a Grey Tit-Flycatcher?
18th of 21
Of the 21 parks where we can rate Grey Tit-Flycatcher sightings, Queen Elizabeth National Park ranks 18th at under 5%. The best odds are in uMkhuze Game Reserve (South Africa, about 20%), Kibale National Park (Uganda, about 20%) and Niokolo-Koba National Park (Senegal, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Grey Tit-Flycatcher live in Queen Elizabeth National Park?
Same family: Muscicapidae
The closest relatives of the Grey Tit-Flycatcher that you can see in Queen Elizabeth National Park (family Muscicapidae, Old World Flycatchers, Robins, and Chats) are White-browed Robin-Chat (about 40%), Northern Black-Flycatcher (about 40%) and Swamp Flycatcher (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Grey Tit-Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Grey Tit-Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Queen Elizabeth National Park (25 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.