What are the chances of seeing a Whinchat in Queen Elizabeth National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Whinchat sighting in Queen Elizabeth National Park on a given day, based on 211 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 135th most-seen of the 434 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Whinchat in Queen Elizabeth National Park?
February–March and December
In those months about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Whinchat in Queen Elizabeth National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April to September, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Whinchat?
Between 2 and 5 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Whinchat sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Queen Elizabeth National Park the best place to see a Whinchat?
10th of 43
Of the 43 parks where we can rate Whinchat sightings, Queen Elizabeth National Park ranks 10th at about 10%. The best odds are in Mercantour National Park (France, about 40%), Vanoise National Park (France, about 40%) and Kidepo Valley National Park (Uganda, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Whinchat live in Queen Elizabeth National Park?
Same family: Muscicapidae
The closest relatives of the Whinchat that you can see in Queen Elizabeth National Park (family Muscicapidae, Old World Flycatchers, Robins, and Chats) are White-browed Robin-Chat (about 40%), Northern Black-Flycatcher (about 40%) and Swamp Flycatcher (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Whinchat sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Whinchat is recorded against all the birds logged in Queen Elizabeth National Park (211 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.