Haemodiasma tessellata
In 3 days ~40% in a week ~70%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rincón de la Vieja National Park | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica | |
| 2 | Chirripó National Park | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica | |
| 3 | Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica | |
| 4 | Arenal Volcano National Park | 🇨🇷 Costa Rica | |
| 5 | La Amistad International Park (Panama) | 🇵🇦 Panama |
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Haemodiasma tessellata sighting in Rincón de la Vieja National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 36th most-seen of the 56 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
August
In that month about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Haemodiasma tessellata in Rincón de la Vieja National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May–July and September–March, the lowest months.
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Haemodiasma tessellata sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Yes
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Haemodiasma tessellata sightings, Rincón de la Vieja National Park has the highest daily chance: about 20%. Next come Chirripó National Park (Costa Rica, about 10%) and Monteverde Cloud Forest Reserve (Costa Rica, about 10%).
Same order: Orthoptera
The closest relatives of the Haemodiasma tessellata that you can see in Rincón de la Vieja National Park (order Orthoptera, Grasshoppers, Crickets, and Katydids) are Giant Red-Winged Grasshopper (about 20%) and Ripipteryx limbata (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Haemodiasma tessellata is recorded against all the insects logged in Rincón de la Vieja National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
