What are the chances of seeing a Black-crowned Waxbill in Semuliki National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Black-crowned Waxbill sighting in Semuliki National Park on a given day, based on 57 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 108th most-seen of the 280 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Black-crowned Waxbill in Semuliki National Park?
May
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Black-crowned Waxbill in Semuliki National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February, the lowest month. That is one of Semuliki National Park's wettest months, with about 140 mm of rain against 5 mm in January.
What time of day is best to see a Black-crowned Waxbill?
Between 3 and 6 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Black-crowned Waxbill sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Semuliki National Park the best place to see a Black-crowned Waxbill?
4th of 8
Of the 8 parks where we can rate Black-crowned Waxbill sightings, Semuliki National Park ranks 4th at about 10%. The best odds are in Nyungwe National Park (Rwanda, about 40%), Volcanoes National Park (Rwanda, about 40%) and Kibale National Park (Uganda, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Black-crowned Waxbill live in Semuliki National Park?
Same genus: Estrilda
The closest relatives of the Black-crowned Waxbill that you can see in Semuliki National Park (genus Estrilda, Typical Waxbills) are Orange-cheeked Waxbill (about 30%) and Fawn-breasted Waxbill (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Black-crowned Waxbill sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Black-crowned Waxbill is recorded against all the birds logged in Semuliki National Park (57 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.