What are the chances of seeing a Cock-tailed Tyrant in Serra da Canastra National Park?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report a Cock-tailed Tyrant sighting in Serra da Canastra National Park on a given day, based on 318 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 34th most-seen of the 294 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 80%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Cock-tailed Tyrant in Serra da Canastra National Park?
October and November
In those months about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Cock-tailed Tyrant in Serra da Canastra National Park on a given day, against about 20% in February, the lowest month. Those are among Serra da Canastra National Park's wettest months, with about 200 mm of rain a month against almost none in July.
What time of day is best to see a Cock-tailed Tyrant?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Cock-tailed Tyrant sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Serra da Canastra National Park the best place to see a Cock-tailed Tyrant?
2nd of 2
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Cock-tailed Tyrant sightings, Serra da Canastra National Park ranks 2nd at about 40%. The best odds are in Emas National Park (Brazil, about 50%).
Which relatives of the Cock-tailed Tyrant live in Serra da Canastra National Park?
Same family: Tyrannidae
The closest relatives of the Cock-tailed Tyrant that you can see in Serra da Canastra National Park (family Tyrannidae, Tyrant Flycatchers) are Great Kiskadee (about 60%), White-rumped Monjita (about 50%) and Crested Black-Tyrant (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Cock-tailed Tyrant sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Cock-tailed Tyrant is recorded against all the birds logged in Serra da Canastra National Park (318 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.