What are the chances of seeing a Short-crested Flycatcher in Serra da Canastra National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Short-crested Flycatcher sighting in Serra da Canastra National Park on a given day, based on 207 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 46th most-seen of the 294 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 70%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Short-crested Flycatcher in Serra da Canastra National Park?
October
In that month about 60% of wildlife watchers report a Short-crested Flycatcher in Serra da Canastra National Park on a given day, against about 10% in February and December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Short-crested Flycatcher?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Short-crested Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Serra da Canastra National Park the best place to see a Short-crested Flycatcher?
Yes
Of the 19 parks where we can rate Short-crested Flycatcher sightings, Serra da Canastra National Park has the highest daily chance: about 30%. Next come Itatiaia National Park (Brazil, about 30%) and Parque Estadual Encontro das Águas (Brazil, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Short-crested Flycatcher live in Serra da Canastra National Park?
Same genus: Myiarchus
The closest relatives of the Short-crested Flycatcher that you can see in Serra da Canastra National Park (genus Myiarchus, Myiarchus Flycatchers) are Brown-crested Flycatcher (about 20%) and Swainson's Flycatcher (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Short-crested Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Short-crested Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Serra da Canastra National Park (207 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.