What are the chances of seeing a Blue-Topped Satyr in Serra dos Órgãos National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Blue-Topped Satyr sighting in Serra dos Órgãos National Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 83rd most-seen of the 117 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Blue-Topped Satyr in Serra dos Órgãos National Park?
May
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report a Blue-Topped Satyr in Serra dos Órgãos National Park on a given day, against under 5% in August to April, the lowest months. That is one of Serra dos Órgãos National Park's driest months, with about 95 mm of rain against 310 mm in November.
What time of day is best to see a Blue-Topped Satyr?
Between 10 am and 1 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Blue-Topped Satyr sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Serra dos Órgãos National Park the best place to see a Blue-Topped Satyr?
2nd of 5
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Blue-Topped Satyr sightings, Serra dos Órgãos National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%. The best odds are in Podocarpus National Park (Ecuador, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Blue-Topped Satyr live in Serra dos Órgãos National Park?
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Blue-Topped Satyr that you can see in Serra dos Órgãos National Park (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Dark Owl-Butterfly (about 30%), Melinaea ludovica (about 20%) and White Peacock (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Blue-Topped Satyr sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Blue-Topped Satyr is recorded against all the insects logged in Serra dos Órgãos National Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.