Asalebria geminella
In 3 days ~30% in a week ~50%
Asalebria geminella is a species of snout moth belonging to the genus Asalebria. It was originally described by Eduard Friedrich Eversmann in 1844. This moth species is found in several countries, including Spain, Portugal, Hungary, Russia and Turkey. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sierra Nevada National Park | 🇪🇸 Spain |
More parks will be added in future updates.
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Asalebria geminella sighting in Sierra Nevada National Park on a given day, based on 11 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 282nd most-seen of the 479 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
June
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report an Asalebria geminella in Sierra Nevada National Park on a given day, against under 5% in August to March, the lowest months.
Between 10 pm and 1 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Asalebria geminella sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Only Sierra Nevada National Park, in our data
Sierra Nevada National Park is the only park on Wallace's Line with enough records to rate Asalebria geminella sightings: about 10% of wildlife watchers there report one on a given day.
Same family: Pyralidae
The closest relatives of the Asalebria geminella that you can see in Sierra Nevada National Park (family Pyralidae, Pyralid Snout Moths) are Rosy Tabby (about 20%), Long-Legged Tabby (about 10%) and Bostra obsoletalis (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Asalebria geminella is recorded against all the insects logged in Sierra Nevada National Park (11 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
