What are the chances of seeing a Long-Legged Tabby in Sierra Nevada National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Long-Legged Tabby sighting in Sierra Nevada National Park on a given day, based on 22 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 147th most-seen of the 479 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Long-Legged Tabby in Sierra Nevada National Park?
July and August
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Long-Legged Tabby in Sierra Nevada National Park on a given day, against under 5% in September to June, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Long-Legged Tabby?
Between 10 pm and 1 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Long-Legged Tabby sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Sierra Nevada National Park the best place to see a Long-Legged Tabby?
Yes
Of the 7 parks where we can rate Long-Legged Tabby sightings, Sierra Nevada National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Aigüestortes National Park (Spain, about 10%) and Wadden Sea National Park (Germany, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Long-Legged Tabby live in Sierra Nevada National Park?
Same family: Pyralidae
The closest relatives of the Long-Legged Tabby that you can see in Sierra Nevada National Park (family Pyralidae, Pyralid Snout Moths) are Rosy Tabby (about 20%), Bostra obsoletalis (about 10%) and Asalebria geminella (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Long-Legged Tabby sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Long-Legged Tabby is recorded against all the insects logged in Sierra Nevada National Park (22 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.