What are the chances of seeing a Burnt-neck Eremomela in South Luangwa National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Burnt-neck Eremomela sighting in South Luangwa National Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 242nd most-seen of the 257 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to under 5%, and over a week to about 10%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Burnt-neck Eremomela in South Luangwa National Park?
Any time of year
In every month with enough records, under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Burnt-neck Eremomela in South Luangwa National Park on a given day, so our monthly data shows no clear season.
What time of day is best to see a Burnt-neck Eremomela?
Between 6 and 9 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Burnt-neck Eremomela sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is South Luangwa National Park the best place to see a Burnt-neck Eremomela?
9th of 11
Of the 11 parks where we can rate Burnt-neck Eremomela sightings, South Luangwa National Park ranks 9th at under 5%. The best odds are in Waterberg Plateau Park (Namibia, about 10%), Pilanesberg National Park (South Africa, about 10%) and uMkhuze Game Reserve (South Africa, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Burnt-neck Eremomela live in South Luangwa National Park?
Same family: Cisticolidae
The closest relatives of the Burnt-neck Eremomela that you can see in South Luangwa National Park (family Cisticolidae, Cisticolas and Allies) are Green-backed Camaroptera (about 30%), Tawny-flanked Prinia (about 20%) and Rattling Cisticola (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Burnt-neck Eremomela sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Burnt-neck Eremomela is recorded against all the birds logged in South Luangwa National Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.