What are the chances of seeing an Adrapsa ablualis in Springbrook National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Adrapsa ablualis sighting in Springbrook National Park on a given day, based on 13 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 138th most-seen of the 429 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Adrapsa ablualis in Springbrook National Park?
March and April
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report an Adrapsa ablualis in Springbrook National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January, May and July–November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Adrapsa ablualis?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Adrapsa ablualis sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Is Springbrook National Park the best place to see an Adrapsa ablualis?
Among the best
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Adrapsa ablualis sightings, Springbrook National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Daintree National Park (Australia, about 10%) and Lamington National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Adrapsa ablualis live in Springbrook National Park?
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the Adrapsa ablualis that you can see in Springbrook National Park (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Eilema plana (about 20%), Asian Magpie Moth (about 20%) and Jute Looper (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Adrapsa ablualis sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Adrapsa ablualis is recorded against all the insects logged in Springbrook National Park (13 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.