What are the chances of seeing an Agathia prasinaspis in Springbrook National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Agathia prasinaspis sighting in Springbrook National Park on a given day, based on 10 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 180th most-seen of the 429 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Agathia prasinaspis in Springbrook National Park?
March–May and July–December
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Agathia prasinaspis in Springbrook National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January–February and June, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Agathia prasinaspis?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Agathia prasinaspis sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Is Springbrook National Park the best place to see an Agathia prasinaspis?
Among the best
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Agathia prasinaspis sightings, Springbrook National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Lamington National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Agathia prasinaspis live in Springbrook National Park?
Same family: Geometridae
The closest relatives of the Agathia prasinaspis that you can see in Springbrook National Park (family Geometridae, Geometer Moths) are Paradromulia ambigua (about 20%), White Looper Moth (about 20%) and Southern Bracca (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Agathia prasinaspis sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Agathia prasinaspis is recorded against all the insects logged in Springbrook National Park (10 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.