What are the chances of seeing a Cyme structa in Springbrook National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Cyme structa sighting in Springbrook National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 262nd most-seen of the 429 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Cyme structa in Springbrook National Park?
March
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Cyme structa in Springbrook National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February, April–September and December, the lowest months. That is one of Springbrook National Park's wettest months, with about 190 mm of rain against 45 mm in August.
What time of day is best to see a Cyme structa?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Cyme structa sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Springbrook National Park the best place to see a Cyme structa?
3rd of 3
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Cyme structa sightings, Springbrook National Park ranks 3rd at about 10%. The best odds are in Booderee National Park (Australia, about 20%) and Lamington National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Cyme structa live in Springbrook National Park?
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the Cyme structa that you can see in Springbrook National Park (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Eilema plana (about 20%), Asian Magpie Moth (about 20%) and Jute Looper (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Cyme structa sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Cyme structa is recorded against all the insects logged in Springbrook National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.