What are the chances of seeing an Imperial Fruit Sucking Moth in Springbrook National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Imperial Fruit Sucking Moth sighting in Springbrook National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 262nd most-seen of the 429 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Imperial Fruit Sucking Moth in Springbrook National Park?
April
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report an Imperial Fruit Sucking Moth in Springbrook National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May–July and September–January, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Imperial Fruit Sucking Moth?
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Imperial Fruit Sucking Moth sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Springbrook National Park the best place to see an Imperial Fruit Sucking Moth?
2nd of 3
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Imperial Fruit Sucking Moth sightings, Springbrook National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%. The best odds are in Daintree National Park (Australia, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Imperial Fruit Sucking Moth live in Springbrook National Park?
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the Imperial Fruit Sucking Moth that you can see in Springbrook National Park (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Eilema plana (about 20%), Asian Magpie Moth (about 20%) and Jute Looper (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Imperial Fruit Sucking Moth sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Imperial Fruit Sucking Moth is recorded against all the insects logged in Springbrook National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.