What are the chances of seeing a Laspeyria concavata in Springbrook National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Laspeyria concavata sighting in Springbrook National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 228th most-seen of the 429 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Laspeyria concavata in Springbrook National Park?
August
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Laspeyria concavata in Springbrook National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May–July and October–March, the lowest months. That is one of Springbrook National Park's driest months, with about 45 mm of rain against 210 mm in February.
What time of day is best to see a Laspeyria concavata?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Laspeyria concavata sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Springbrook National Park the best place to see a Laspeyria concavata?
Among the best
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Laspeyria concavata sightings, Springbrook National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Blue Mountains National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Laspeyria concavata live in Springbrook National Park?
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the Laspeyria concavata that you can see in Springbrook National Park (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Eilema plana (about 20%), Asian Magpie Moth (about 20%) and Jute Looper (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Laspeyria concavata sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Laspeyria concavata is recorded against all the insects logged in Springbrook National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.