What are the chances of seeing an Orthaga seminivea in Springbrook National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Orthaga seminivea sighting in Springbrook National Park on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 262nd most-seen of the 429 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Orthaga seminivea in Springbrook National Park?
January
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report an Orthaga seminivea in Springbrook National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–October and December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Orthaga seminivea?
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Orthaga seminivea sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Is Springbrook National Park the best place to see an Orthaga seminivea?
Among the best
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Orthaga seminivea sightings, Springbrook National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Daintree National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Orthaga seminivea live in Springbrook National Park?
Same family: Pyralidae
The closest relatives of the Orthaga seminivea that you can see in Springbrook National Park (family Pyralidae, Pyralid Snout Moths) are Endotricha mesenterialis (about 20%), Coconut Spike Moth (about 10%) and Stericta concisella (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Orthaga seminivea sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Orthaga seminivea is recorded against all the insects logged in Springbrook National Park (9 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.