Stericta concisella
In 3 days ~20% in a week ~40%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Springbrook National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 2 | Lamington National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 3 | Daintree National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 4 | Blue Mountains National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brisbane | 🇦🇺 Australia |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Stericta concisella sighting in Springbrook National Park on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 262nd most-seen of the 429 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
January, March–May and July–August
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Stericta concisella in Springbrook National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February, June and September–December, the lowest months.
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Stericta concisella sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Yes
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Stericta concisella sightings, Springbrook National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Lamington National Park (Australia, about 10%) and Daintree National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Same family: Pyralidae
The closest relatives of the Stericta concisella that you can see in Springbrook National Park (family Pyralidae, Pyralid Snout Moths) are Endotricha mesenterialis (about 20%), Coconut Spike Moth (about 10%) and Orthaga seminivea (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Stericta concisella is recorded against all the insects logged in Springbrook National Park (9 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
