What are the chances of seeing a Thalatha bryochlora in Springbrook National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Thalatha bryochlora sighting in Springbrook National Park on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 262nd most-seen of the 429 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Thalatha bryochlora in Springbrook National Park?
June
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Thalatha bryochlora in Springbrook National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May and July–January, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Thalatha bryochlora?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Thalatha bryochlora sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Springbrook National Park the best place to see a Thalatha bryochlora?
Among the best
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Thalatha bryochlora sightings, Springbrook National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Lamington National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Thalatha bryochlora live in Springbrook National Park?
Same family: Noctuidae
The closest relatives of the Thalatha bryochlora that you can see in Springbrook National Park (family Noctuidae, Cutworm Moths and Allies) are Green-Blotched Moth (about 10%), Brown Cutworm (about 10%) and Dark-Barred Wainscot (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Thalatha bryochlora sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Thalatha bryochlora is recorded against all the insects logged in Springbrook National Park (9 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.