What are the chances of seeing a Thoracolopha flexirena in Springbrook National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Thoracolopha flexirena sighting in Springbrook National Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 262nd most-seen of the 429 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Thoracolopha flexirena in Springbrook National Park?
August
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Thoracolopha flexirena in Springbrook National Park on a given day, against under 5% in September to July, the lowest months. That is one of Springbrook National Park's driest months, with about 45 mm of rain against 210 mm in February.
What time of day is best to see a Thoracolopha flexirena?
Between 6 and 9 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Thoracolopha flexirena sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Springbrook National Park the best place to see a Thoracolopha flexirena?
Yes
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Thoracolopha flexirena sightings, Springbrook National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Blue Mountains National Park (Australia, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Thoracolopha flexirena live in Springbrook National Park?
Same family: Noctuidae
The closest relatives of the Thoracolopha flexirena that you can see in Springbrook National Park (family Noctuidae, Cutworm Moths and Allies) are Green-Blotched Moth (about 10%), Brown Cutworm (about 10%) and Dark-Barred Wainscot (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Thoracolopha flexirena sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Thoracolopha flexirena is recorded against all the insects logged in Springbrook National Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.