What are the chances of seeing a Bontebok/Blesbok in Table Mountain National Park?
Possible
About 30% of wildlife watchers report a Bontebok/Blesbok sighting in Table Mountain National Park on a given day, based on 684 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 5th most-seen of the 39 mammals we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 60%, and over a week to about 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Bontebok/Blesbok in Table Mountain National Park?
March–May and September–November
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Bontebok/Blesbok in Table Mountain National Park on a given day, against about 20% in June–August and December–February, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Bontebok/Blesbok?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Bontebok/Blesbok sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Table Mountain National Park the best place to see a Bontebok/Blesbok?
4th of 6
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Bontebok/Blesbok sightings, Table Mountain National Park ranks 4th at about 30%. The best odds are in De Hoop Nature Reserve (South Africa, about 80%), West Coast National Park (South Africa, about 70%) and Golden Gate Highlands National Park (South Africa, about 60%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Bontebok/Blesbok live in Table Mountain National Park?
Same family: Bovidae
The closest relatives of the Bontebok/Blesbok that you can see in Table Mountain National Park (family Bovidae, Bovids) are Common Eland (about 30%), Klipspringer (about 10%) and Himalayan Tahr (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Bontebok/Blesbok sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Bontebok/Blesbok is recorded against all the mammals logged in Table Mountain National Park (684 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.