What are the chances of seeing an Ochraceous Bulbul in Taman Negara National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report an Ochraceous Bulbul sighting in Taman Negara National Park on a given day, based on 55 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 178th most-seen of the 293 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Ochraceous Bulbul in Taman Negara National Park?
January and March
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Ochraceous Bulbul in Taman Negara National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February and April–December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Ochraceous Bulbul?
Between 3 and 6 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Ochraceous Bulbul sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Taman Negara National Park the best place to see an Ochraceous Bulbul?
6th of 7
Of the 7 parks where we can rate Ochraceous Bulbul sightings, Taman Negara National Park ranks 6th at under 5%. The best odds are in Khao Luang National Park (Thailand, about 60%), Kinabalu Park (Malaysia, about 50%) and Khao Sok National Park (Thailand, about 50%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Ochraceous Bulbul live in Taman Negara National Park?
Same genus: Alophoixus
The closest relatives of the Ochraceous Bulbul that you can see in Taman Negara National Park (genus Alophoixus, Bearded Bulbuls and Allies) are Brown-cheeked Bulbul (about 40%), Yellow-bellied Bulbul (about 40%) and Finsch's Bulbul (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Ochraceous Bulbul sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Ochraceous Bulbul is recorded against all the birds logged in Taman Negara National Park (55 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.