Boana steinbachi
Silhouette: Andy Wilson · PhyloPic
In 3 days ~30% in a week ~50%
Boana steinbachi is a frog that endemic to Amazonia. It has been found in Brazil, Peru, and Bolivia. The species was originally synonymized with the Gunther's banded tree frog (Boana fasciata) but was resurrected as a species in 2014. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Manu National Park | 🇵🇪 Peru | |
| 2 | Tambopata National Reserve | 🇵🇪 Peru |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Sara Tree Frog sighting in Tambopata National Reserve on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 35th most-seen of the 44 amphibians we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
June
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Sara Tree Frog in Tambopata National Reserve on a given day, against under 5% in April–May, August–September and November–January, the lowest months. That is one of Tambopata National Reserve's driest months, with about 80 mm of rain against 420 mm in February.
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Sara Tree Frog sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
2nd of 2
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Sara Tree Frog sightings, Tambopata National Reserve ranks 2nd at about 10%. The best odds are in Manu National Park (Peru, about 20%).
Same genus: Boana
The closest relatives of the Sara Tree Frog that you can see in Tambopata National Reserve (genus Boana, Gladiator Tree Frogs) are Map Tree Frog (about 20%), Rusty Tree Frog (about 20%) and Rocket Tree Frog (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Sara Tree Frog is recorded against all the amphibians logged in Tambopata National Reserve (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
