What are the chances of seeing a Blue-Tailed Forest Hawk in Taroko National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Blue-Tailed Forest Hawk sighting in Taroko National Park on a given day, based on 21 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 87th most-seen of the 447 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Blue-Tailed Forest Hawk in Taroko National Park?
October
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Blue-Tailed Forest Hawk in Taroko National Park on a given day, against under 5% in September and December–February, the lowest months. That is one of Taroko National Park's wettest months, with about 570 mm of rain against 290 mm in December.
What time of day is best to see a Blue-Tailed Forest Hawk?
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Blue-Tailed Forest Hawk sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Taroko National Park the best place to see a Blue-Tailed Forest Hawk?
3rd of 5
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Blue-Tailed Forest Hawk sightings, Taroko National Park ranks 3rd at about 20%. The best odds are in Namdapha National Park (India, about 40%) and Doi Inthanon National Park (Thailand, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Blue-Tailed Forest Hawk live in Taroko National Park?
Same genus: Orthetrum
The closest relatives of the Blue-Tailed Forest Hawk that you can see in Taroko National Park (genus Orthetrum) are Blue Marsh Hawk (about 20%), Crimson-Tailed Marsh Hawk (about 10%) and Slender Skimmer (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Blue-Tailed Forest Hawk sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Blue-Tailed Forest Hawk is recorded against all the insects logged in Taroko National Park (21 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.