Nevrina procopia
In 3 days ~30% in a week ~60%
Nevrina procopia is a moth in the family Crambidae. It was described by Stoll in 1781. The type locality is unknown. It is found from Sri Lanka, India, Bhutan, South China, Taiwan, southern Japan, Philippines, Malaysia, Singapore, Sumatra, Java, and New Guinea. Wikipedia →
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Taroko National Park | 🇹🇼 Taiwan | |
| 2 | Kinabalu Park | 🇲🇾 Malaysia |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Taipei | 🇹🇼 Taiwan |
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Nevrina procopia sighting in Taroko National Park on a given day, based on 13 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 148th most-seen of the 447 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
February, July, September and December
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Nevrina procopia in Taroko National Park on a given day, against under 5% in June, August and November, the lowest months.
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Nevrina procopia sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Yes
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Nevrina procopia sightings, Taroko National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Kinabalu Park (Malaysia, about 10%).
Same family: Crambidae
The closest relatives of the Nevrina procopia that you can see in Taroko National Park (family Crambidae, Crambid Snout Moths) are Bradina diagonalis (about 10%), Symmoracma minoralis (about 10%) and Paracymoriza cataclystalis (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Nevrina procopia is recorded against all the insects logged in Taroko National Park (13 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
