What are the chances of seeing a White-Underwing Artena in Taroko National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a White-Underwing Artena sighting in Taroko National Park on a given day, based on 10 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 240th most-seen of the 447 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a White-Underwing Artena in Taroko National Park?
January
In that month about 30% of wildlife watchers report a White-Underwing Artena in Taroko National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February, April–May and September–December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a White-Underwing Artena?
Between midnight and 3 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most White-Underwing Artena sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Is Taroko National Park the best place to see a White-Underwing Artena?
2nd of 3
Of the 3 parks where we can rate White-Underwing Artena sightings, Taroko National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%. The best odds are in Kanha National Park (India, about 20%).
Which relatives of the White-Underwing Artena live in Taroko National Park?
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the White-Underwing Artena that you can see in Taroko National Park (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Cocoa Tussock Moth (about 60%), Taiwan Yellow Tussock Moth (about 50%) and Chrysaeglia magnifica (about 40%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the White-Underwing Artena sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the White-Underwing Artena is recorded against all the insects logged in Taroko National Park (10 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.