What are the chances of seeing a Plumbeous Hawk in Utría National Natural Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Plumbeous Hawk sighting in Utría National Natural Park on a given day, based on 6 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 135th most-seen of the 154 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Plumbeous Hawk in Utría National Natural Park?
May
In that month about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Plumbeous Hawk in Utría National Natural Park on a given day, against under 5% in February–March and July–September, the lowest months. April, June and December have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Plumbeous Hawk?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Plumbeous Hawk sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Utría National Natural Park the best place to see a Plumbeous Hawk?
Yes
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Plumbeous Hawk sightings, Utría National Natural Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Darién National Park (Panama, about 10%) and Soberanía National Park (Panama, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Plumbeous Hawk live in Utría National Natural Park?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the Plumbeous Hawk that you can see in Utría National Natural Park (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are Common Black-Hawk (about 30%), Roadside Hawk (about 10%) and American Swallow-tailed Kite (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Plumbeous Hawk sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Plumbeous Hawk is recorded against all the birds logged in Utría National Natural Park (6 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.