What are the chances of seeing a Plumbeous Kite in Utría National Natural Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Plumbeous Kite sighting in Utría National Natural Park on a given day, based on 8 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 123rd most-seen of the 154 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Plumbeous Kite in Utría National Natural Park?
February and August
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Plumbeous Kite in Utría National Natural Park on a given day, against under 5% in January, March, May, July and September–November, the lowest months. April, June and December have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Plumbeous Kite?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Plumbeous Kite sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Utría National Natural Park the best place to see a Plumbeous Kite?
20th of 48
Of the 48 parks where we can rate Plumbeous Kite sightings, Utría National Natural Park ranks 20th at about 10%. The best odds are in Manu National Park (Peru, about 30%), Cuyabeno Wildlife Reserve (Ecuador, about 30%) and Yasuní National Park (Ecuador, about 20%).
Which relatives of the Plumbeous Kite live in Utría National Natural Park?
Same family: Accipitridae
The closest relatives of the Plumbeous Kite that you can see in Utría National Natural Park (family Accipitridae, Hawks, Eagles, and Kites) are Common Black-Hawk (about 30%), Roadside Hawk (about 10%) and American Swallow-tailed Kite (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Plumbeous Kite sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Plumbeous Kite is recorded against all the birds logged in Utría National Natural Park (8 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.