What are the chances of seeing a White Satin Moth in Wadden Sea National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a White Satin Moth sighting in Wadden Sea National Park on a given day, based on 19 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 312th most-seen of the 818 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 30%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a White Satin Moth in Wadden Sea National Park?
May to July
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a White Satin Moth in Wadden Sea National Park on a given day, against under 5% in August to April, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a White Satin Moth?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most White Satin Moth sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is seen both by day and at night.
Is Wadden Sea National Park the best place to see a White Satin Moth?
8th of 8
Of the 8 parks where we can rate White Satin Moth sightings, Wadden Sea National Park ranks 8th at about 10%. The best odds are in Isle Royale National Park (United States, about 40%), Gros Morne National Park (Canada, about 20%) and Ecrins National Park (France, about 10%).
Which relatives of the White Satin Moth live in Wadden Sea National Park?
Same family: Erebidae
The closest relatives of the White Satin Moth that you can see in Wadden Sea National Park (family Erebidae, Underwing, Tiger, Tussock, and Allied Moths) are Cinnabar Moth (about 20%), Brown-Tail Moth (about 20%) and Ruby Tiger Moth (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the White Satin Moth sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the White Satin Moth is recorded against all the insects logged in Wadden Sea National Park (19 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.