What are the chances of seeing a Little Scarlet in Waterberg Plateau Park?
Likely
About 40% of wildlife watchers report a Little Scarlet sighting in Waterberg Plateau Park on a given day, based on 9 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 11th most-seen of the 24 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 80%, and over a week to over 90%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Little Scarlet in Waterberg Plateau Park?
February
In that month about 70% of wildlife watchers report a Little Scarlet in Waterberg Plateau Park on a given day, against about 10% in January, March–May, July and September, the lowest months. That is one of Waterberg Plateau Park's wettest months, with about 80 mm of rain against almost none in May.
What time of day is best to see a Little Scarlet?
Between 11 am and 2 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Little Scarlet sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Waterberg Plateau Park the best place to see a Little Scarlet?
Yes
Of the 5 parks where we can rate Little Scarlet sightings, Waterberg Plateau Park has the highest daily chance: about 40%. Next come De Hoop Nature Reserve (South Africa, about 10%) and Garden Route National Park (South Africa, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Little Scarlet live in Waterberg Plateau Park?
Same family: Libellulidae
The closest relatives of the Little Scarlet that you can see in Waterberg Plateau Park (family Libellulidae, Skimmers) are Julia Skimmer (about 40%) and Orange-Winged Dropwing (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Little Scarlet sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Little Scarlet is recorded against all the insects logged in Waterberg Plateau Park (9 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.