What are the chances of seeing a Korean Flycatcher in Way Kambas National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Korean Flycatcher sighting in Way Kambas National Park on a given day, based on 29 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 148th most-seen of the 205 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 50%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Korean Flycatcher in Way Kambas National Park?
October
In that month about 50% of wildlife watchers report a Korean Flycatcher in Way Kambas National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May and July–September, the lowest months. November to February have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Korean Flycatcher?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Korean Flycatcher sightings with a recorded time, and about 8 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Way Kambas National Park the best place to see a Korean Flycatcher?
Among the best
Of the 9 parks where we can rate Korean Flycatcher sightings, Way Kambas National Park ranks 2nd at about 10%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Khao Luang National Park (Thailand, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Korean Flycatcher live in Way Kambas National Park?
Same family: Muscicapidae
The closest relatives of the Korean Flycatcher that you can see in Way Kambas National Park (family Muscicapidae, Old World Flycatchers, Robins, and Chats) are Malaysian Blue-Flycatcher (about 30%) and Grey-chested Jungle Flycatcher (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Korean Flycatcher sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Korean Flycatcher is recorded against all the birds logged in Way Kambas National Park (29 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.