What are the chances of seeing an Eccymatoge callizona in Wilsons Promontory National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Eccymatoge callizona sighting in Wilsons Promontory National Park on a given day, based on 11 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 32nd most-seen of the 60 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 30%, and over a week to about 60%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Eccymatoge callizona in Wilsons Promontory National Park?
January
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report an Eccymatoge callizona in Wilsons Promontory National Park on a given day, against under 5% in February to December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Eccymatoge callizona?
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Eccymatoge callizona sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is mostly seen at night.
Is Wilsons Promontory National Park the best place to see an Eccymatoge callizona?
Yes
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Eccymatoge callizona sightings, Wilsons Promontory National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Great Otway National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Eccymatoge callizona live in Wilsons Promontory National Park?
Same family: Geometridae
The closest relatives of the Eccymatoge callizona that you can see in Wilsons Promontory National Park (family Geometridae, Geometer Moths) are Finely-Lined Carpet (about 10%), Epyaxa agelasta (about 10%) and Apple Looper (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Eccymatoge callizona sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Eccymatoge callizona is recorded against all the insects logged in Wilsons Promontory National Park (11 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.