What are the chances of seeing a Rufous-headed Woodpecker in Yasuní National Park?
Rare
Under 5% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous-headed Woodpecker sighting in Yasuní National Park on a given day, based on 97 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 313th most-seen of the 533 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 10%, and over a week to about 20%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Rufous-headed Woodpecker in Yasuní National Park?
August and October–November
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Rufous-headed Woodpecker in Yasuní National Park on a given day, against under 5% in September and December–July, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Rufous-headed Woodpecker?
Between 8 and 11 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Rufous-headed Woodpecker sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Yasuní National Park the best place to see a Rufous-headed Woodpecker?
Yes
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Rufous-headed Woodpecker sightings, Yasuní National Park has the highest daily chance: under 5%. Next come Manu National Park (Peru, under 5%) and Tambopata National Reserve (Peru, under 5%).
Which relatives of the Rufous-headed Woodpecker live in Yasuní National Park?
Same genus: Celeus
The closest relatives of the Rufous-headed Woodpecker that you can see in Yasuní National Park (genus Celeus, Neotropical Crested Woodpeckers) are Cream-colored Woodpecker (about 20%), Chestnut Woodpecker (about 10%) and Waved Woodpecker (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Rufous-headed Woodpecker sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Rufous-headed Woodpecker is recorded against all the birds logged in Yasuní National Park (97 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.