What are the chances of seeing a Baeotus deucalion in Amacayacu National Natural Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Baeotus deucalion sighting in Amacayacu National Natural Park on a given day, based on 5 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 7th most-seen of the 11 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Baeotus deucalion in Amacayacu National Natural Park?
February and October
In those months about 30% of wildlife watchers report a Baeotus deucalion in Amacayacu National Natural Park on a given day, against under 5% in March–July, September and November–December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Baeotus deucalion?
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Baeotus deucalion sightings with a recorded time, and nearly all of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Amacayacu National Natural Park the best place to see a Baeotus deucalion?
Yes
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Baeotus deucalion sightings, Amacayacu National Natural Park has the highest daily chance: about 20%. Next come Yasuní National Park (Ecuador, about 10%) and Tambopata National Reserve (Peru, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Baeotus deucalion live in Amacayacu National Natural Park?
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Baeotus deucalion that you can see in Amacayacu National Natural Park (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Many-Banded Daggerwing (about 20%), Julia Heliconian (about 20%) and Pierella rhea (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Baeotus deucalion sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Baeotus deucalion is recorded against all the insects logged in Amacayacu National Natural Park (5 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.