What are the chances of seeing a Lyca Numberwing in Arenal Volcano National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Lyca Numberwing sighting in Arenal Volcano National Park on a given day, based on 10 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 129th most-seen of the 302 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Lyca Numberwing in Arenal Volcano National Park?
July and August
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Lyca Numberwing in Arenal Volcano National Park on a given day, against under 5% in September–October and December–May, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Lyca Numberwing?
Between 9 am and noon
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Lyca Numberwing sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Arenal Volcano National Park the best place to see a Lyca Numberwing?
6th of 6
Of the 6 parks where we can rate Lyca Numberwing sightings, Arenal Volcano National Park ranks 6th at about 10%. The best odds are in Rincón de la Vieja National Park (Costa Rica, about 20%), Podocarpus National Park (Ecuador, about 10%) and Tenorio Volcano National Park (Costa Rica, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Lyca Numberwing live in Arenal Volcano National Park?
Same family: Nymphalidae
The closest relatives of the Lyca Numberwing that you can see in Arenal Volcano National Park (family Nymphalidae, Brush-footed Butterflies) are Banded Peacock (about 30%), Banded Owl-Butterfly (about 20%) and Julia Heliconian (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Lyca Numberwing sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Lyca Numberwing is recorded against all the insects logged in Arenal Volcano National Park (10 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.