What are the chances of seeing a Garner’s Tiger Beetle in Arthur's Pass National Park?
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report a Garner’s Tiger Beetle sighting in Arthur's Pass National Park on a given day, based on 12 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 15th most-seen of the 60 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Garner’s Tiger Beetle in Arthur's Pass National Park?
December to February
In those months about 20% of wildlife watchers report a Garner’s Tiger Beetle in Arthur's Pass National Park on a given day, against under 5% in April to November, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Garner’s Tiger Beetle?
Between noon and 3 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Garner’s Tiger Beetle sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Arthur's Pass National Park the best place to see a Garner’s Tiger Beetle?
Yes
Of the 2 parks where we can rate Garner’s Tiger Beetle sightings, Arthur's Pass National Park has the highest daily chance: about 20%. Next come Fiordland National Park (New Zealand, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Garner’s Tiger Beetle live in Arthur's Pass National Park?
Same order: Coleoptera
The closest relatives of the Garner’s Tiger Beetle that you can see in Arthur's Pass National Park (order Coleoptera, Beetles) are Manuka Beetle (about 10%), Beech Buprestid Beetle (about 10%) and New Zealand Reticulated Stag Beetle (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Garner’s Tiger Beetle sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Garner’s Tiger Beetle is recorded against all the insects logged in Arthur's Pass National Park (12 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.