What are the chances of seeing a Red-throated Barbet in Bako National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Red-throated Barbet sighting in Bako National Park on a given day, based on 7 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 60th most-seen of the 70 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Red-throated Barbet in Bako National Park?
January–February, April and August
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Red-throated Barbet in Bako National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March, May–July and September–October, the lowest months. November and December have too few records to rate.
What time of day is best to see a Red-throated Barbet?
Between 2 and 5 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Red-throated Barbet sightings with a recorded time, and about 6 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Bako National Park the best place to see a Red-throated Barbet?
7th of 11
Of the 11 parks where we can rate Red-throated Barbet sightings, Bako National Park ranks 7th at about 10%. The best odds are in Khao Luang National Park (Thailand, about 70%), Khao Sok National Park (Thailand, about 30%) and Danum Valley Conservation Area (Malaysia, about 30%). All parks ranked.
Which relatives of the Red-throated Barbet live in Bako National Park?
Same genus: Psilopogon
The closest relatives of the Red-throated Barbet that you can see in Bako National Park (genus Psilopogon, Typical Asian Barbets) are Red-crowned Barbet (about 30%) and Black-eared Barbet (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Red-throated Barbet sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Red-throated Barbet is recorded against all the birds logged in Bako National Park (7 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.