What are the chances of seeing a Blue-faced Malkoha in Bandipur National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report a Blue-faced Malkoha sighting in Bandipur National Park on a given day, based on 77 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 117th most-seen of the 256 birds we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see a Blue-faced Malkoha in Bandipur National Park?
January–April, June and October–November
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report a Blue-faced Malkoha in Bandipur National Park on a given day, against under 5% in May, July–September and December, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see a Blue-faced Malkoha?
Between 7 and 10 am
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Blue-faced Malkoha sightings with a recorded time, and about 9 in 10 of them come between 6 am and 6 pm: it is a daytime animal.
Is Bandipur National Park the best place to see a Blue-faced Malkoha?
6th of 8
Of the 8 parks where we can rate Blue-faced Malkoha sightings, Bandipur National Park ranks 6th at about 10%. The best odds are in Udawalawe National Park (Sri Lanka, about 50%), Yala National Park (Sri Lanka, about 30%) and Wilpattu National Park (Sri Lanka, about 30%).
Which relatives of the Blue-faced Malkoha live in Bandipur National Park?
Same family: Cuculidae
The closest relatives of the Blue-faced Malkoha that you can see in Bandipur National Park (family Cuculidae, Cuckoos) are Greater Coucal (about 40%), Common Hawk-Cuckoo (about 20%) and Asian Koel (about 20%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Blue-faced Malkoha sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Blue-faced Malkoha is recorded against all the birds logged in Bandipur National Park (77 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.