What are the chances of seeing an Alucita phricodes in Blue Mountains National Park?
With luck
About 10% of wildlife watchers report an Alucita phricodes sighting in Blue Mountains National Park on a given day, based on 21 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 181st most-seen of the 789 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 20%, and over a week to about 40%, if each day is a fresh chance.
When is the best time to see an Alucita phricodes in Blue Mountains National Park?
February–March and August–December
In those months about 10% of wildlife watchers report an Alucita phricodes in Blue Mountains National Park on a given day, against under 5% in January and April–July, the lowest months.
What time of day is best to see an Alucita phricodes?
Between 7 and 10 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Alucita phricodes sightings with a recorded time, and about half of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is most active around dawn and dusk.
Is Blue Mountains National Park the best place to see an Alucita phricodes?
Yes
Of the 4 parks where we can rate Alucita phricodes sightings, Blue Mountains National Park has the highest daily chance: about 10%. Next come Lamington National Park (Australia, about 10%) and Springbrook National Park (Australia, about 10%).
Which relatives of the Alucita phricodes live in Blue Mountains National Park?
Same order: Lepidoptera
The closest relatives of the Alucita phricodes that you can see in Blue Mountains National Park (order Lepidoptera, Butterflies and Moths) are Swordgrass Brown (about 40%), Common Brown (about 30%) and Australian Painted Lady (about 30%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
Where does the Alucita phricodes sighting chance come from?
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Alucita phricodes is recorded against all the insects logged in Blue Mountains National Park (21 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.