Cyclocephala signaticollis
In 3 days ~40% in a week ~70%
| # | Park | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Royal National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 2 | Blue Mountains National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 3 | Lamington National Park | 🇦🇺 Australia |
| # | City | Country | Daily sighting probability |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sydney | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 2 | Melbourne | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 3 | Brisbane | 🇦🇺 Australia | |
| 4 | Buenos Aires | 🇦🇷 Argentina |
Possible
About 20% of wildlife watchers report an Argentinian Scarab sighting in Blue Mountains National Park on a given day, based on 72 verified sightings from GBIF citizen-science data from 2019 to 2026. It is the 29th most-seen of the 789 insects we can rate there. Over three days the chance rises to about 40%, and over a week to about 70%, if each day is a fresh chance.
December
In that month about 40% of wildlife watchers report an Argentinian Scarab in Blue Mountains National Park on a given day, against under 5% in March to October, the lowest months.
Between 8 and 11 pm
Across all the parks we cover, that three-hour window holds the most Argentinian Scarab sightings with a recorded time, and about 7 in 10 of them come between 6 pm and 6 am: it is seen both by day and at night.
Among the best
Of the 3 parks where we can rate Argentinian Scarab sightings, Blue Mountains National Park ranks 2nd at about 20%, level with the leaders once rounded. The best odds are in Royal National Park (Australia, about 20%).
Same family: Scarabaeidae
The closest relatives of the Argentinian Scarab that you can see in Blue Mountains National Park (family Scarabaeidae, Scarabs) are Cowboy Beetle (about 10%), Fiddler Beetle (about 10%) and Anoplognathus viriditarsis (about 10%), with each one's daily chance of a sighting.
GBIF citizen-science records
It is estimated from how often the Argentinian Scarab is recorded against all the insects logged in Blue Mountains National Park (72 verified sightings from 2019 to 2026), calibrated against known sighting rates. Figures are rounded to the nearest 10% because citizen-science data supports honest approximations, not decimals, and months with records from fewer than five people show "—". How it works.
